Thanks for an interesting perspective on Canadian libel law....however, would the suit in question not be more based on the onus of Mr. Korpan to prove the bumper stickers were actually claiming that he personally was corrupt? The verbiage (Gawd I hope that's the correct term : ))the authors chose seems to be rather ambiguous on this point, while still seemingly quite damning of Mr. Korpan.
As always I find your perspective and knowledge very refreshing, thanks!
Last edited by yogi bear; 10-03-2008 at 11:10 PM.
Reason: spelling, as usual... : )
Where the pavement ends"