
Originally Posted by
chardonnay
I hope that the members of this community are now asking themselves some valid questions. This VERY UNFORTUNATE CASE, (both for the defendants and the entire community), appears to me to have been a simple matter of the defendants NOT having access to professional guidance and advice at the OUTSET, when it was needed. It seems that if ever there was a case where same was needed, this was it!! There was a need for the counselling of both a lawyer and a mental health professional.
I understand that the Korlek family have resided in Nanaimo for several decades. Wouldn’t those in the community who have known the Korlek family for many years, be in a position to provide their personal knowledge to the court about the defendant’s character, including the CRUCIAL information as to whether the defendant , Mr. Korlek, is MENTALLY CHALLENGED in any way??
There is a presumption that ALL adults are capable of making their own decisions UNLESS the CONTRARY is demonstrated. Unfortunately, not ALL adults UNDERSTAND the CONSEQUENCES of some of their decisions. Therefore, MY QUESTION IS: Was an OPPORTUNITY ever provided to DEMONSTRATE same? (I understand that the defendant did not have legal representation.)
In my view, another important factor in this case is the wearing of the t-shirt by the defendant (displaying that controversial slogan.) I have been wondering where the originator of the controversial t-shirt and slogan has been, as in my estimation, he certainly found an individual, who was most likely easily influenced to display same, which I feel did NOT help the defendant whatsoever, in this case.